“Andrew Gray had a brave idea, but after finishing 11th out of 13 candidates and with only 99 votes, I wouldn’t expect mainstream politicians to rush to copy his tactics just yet,” Alan Mendoza, co-founder and executive director of the Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat said, it’s clear that AI will have an impact on how political parties in the UK<\/a> source and destination data in advance, as well as focus their campaigns,” he argued. “We may not have to wait that long for the first victorious AI-inspired candidate, but they will certainly emerge from one of the major parties, with all the electoral advantages they already have.”<\/p>\n Gray stood for election in a by-election for the Selby and Ainsty constituency in North Yorkshire after Conservative Party member Nigel Adams stood down from his seat with immediate effect.<\/p>\n WH MAKES SEVEN AI DEVELOPERS AGREE ON SAFETY, SECURITY AND TRUST GUIDELINES<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n The seat eventually went to 25-year-old Keir Mather Labor Party candidate<\/a>, but Gray won 99 votes in the election using an AI-generated political manifesto. This won him more votes than the Climate Party candidate and an independent candidate, and fell short of the Heritage Party candidate and a Monster Raving Loony Party candidate.<\/p>\n READ ON THE FOX NEWS APP<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Gray first asked constituents to voice their concerns about local issues on his website through a program called Pol.is, developed by a Seattle group a decade ago and mostly used in Taiwan to resolve gridlocked issues.<\/p>\n In an interview with the Associated Press, Gray argued that Pol.is is not the same as ChatGPT and other generative AI models<\/a> but a “slightly more sophisticated survey than what is already happening.”<\/p>\n The story continues<\/p>\n WHOOPI GOLDBERG MAKES LEGAL PROVISIONS AGAINST TECHNOLOGY AT HER WILL<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n “AI is not so smart that it can spit out exactly what the policies are,” Gray said, stressing that the process still needs “human moderation and … analysis of what would be a sensible policy position.”<\/p>\n But as the program polls users on a topic, it uses real-time machine learning to group statements and map them to identify gaps between viewpoints and points of agreement. Gray said he would use the technology weekly to get a sense of the constituency’s concerns.<\/p>\n The appeal of this kind of platform-building approach can help bring voters into the electoral process in a more direct way, which would be “extremely attractive” to community engagement,<\/a>according to Stacy Rosenberg, associate professor of teaching at Carnegie Mellon University’s Heinz College of Information Systems and Public Policy.<\/p>\n <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n A counting officer watches as ballots are counted during the Selby and Ainsty by-election on July 21, 2023, in Selby, England.<\/p>\n Far from the kind of disinformation device that some make it out to be people are afraid that AI can become<\/a>a tool like Pol.is uses active conversations to compile its data sets, which can play to the crowd that “craves meaningful participation in the decision-making process,” Rosenberg explained to Fox News Digital.<\/p>\n “Giving voters who want a voice that power will be mutually beneficial for campaigns and constituents, as long as ethical considerations for public policy are taken into account.”<\/p>\n AI APP HELPS ELDERLY ADULTS MANAGE THEIR PRESCRIPTIONS WITH A PHOTO<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Ultimately, AI will have deeper impacts on the electoral process, whether through collaborative policy platforms or using generative AI to help build models for speechwriting and marketing materials, Rosenberg noted. The key, he said, is to promote participation versus giving full control to the AI<\/a> of the process<\/p>\n The biggest risk, however, would arise if a politician did not align with the views expressed through this crowdsourcing process and create a sense of “insincere” engagement, Rosenberg warned.<\/p>\n “Voters want candidates who share their views,” he said. “If they think a candidate can be swayed too easily by changing public opinion, they may not trust the politician to protect voters’ interests in the long run.”<\/p>\n Labor Party candidate Keir Mather celebrates winning by 16,456 votes in the Selby and Ainsty by-election on July 21, 2023 in Selby, England.<\/p>\n “Politicians’ use of AI makes the candidate look tech-savvy, [and] could play well with voters in younger demographics or early adopters,\u201d Rosenberg added, acknowledging that the technology could also alienate voters who remain skeptical of AI.<\/p>\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n