The editorial was contradictory
In your July 24 editorial you succinctly laid out the reasons why no one should expect the legalization of psilocybin for therapeutic use to cause problems similar to those that have resulted from the legalization of recreational marijuana. Then, inexplicably, you wrote, “Still, concern among local governments about unintended consequences is understandable, especially given the results of legalizing cannabis.” You just explained why it’s not a reasonable concern!
For those concerned about the “recreational” use of psilocybin, I just want to say, if you want some, I know someone who knows a guy who can get you some. And you probably do too, even if you don’t realize it! Legalizing its therapeutic use won’t change that one bit.
And it is not true that “there is no harm in taking a wait-and-see attitude”. Most of the proposed bans extend over two years. But the therapy could be available later this year. A two-year ban would mean those suffering from addiction, depression, PTSD and other potentially treatable conditions would not have this therapy available. This is a real disservice to the people of our community!
Gordon Hester
Ashland
Algae in Medford’s waterways
Living on Mira Mar Ave (the street to Rogue Valley Manor), I am aware of the residential water runoff when I go to the mailbox. It generally seems harmless, if not exactly drinkable, but lately it’s been worrying me.
A house drain at the corner of Mira Mar and Nieto is spewing a steady stream of algae-laden water that ends up in the storm drain carrying it into Larson and Bear creeks. It is a bilious green color, and is probably the result of a pool being drained after a period of disuse.
I am certain that the water quality in our local waterways is adversely affected by this heinous act of rampant pollution. If detergents and other substances are illegal to pour into our storm drains, then why should a resident be allowed to dump hundreds of gallons of toxic pool wastewater into them with reckless abandon?
Michael Mace
Medford
It will still protect freedoms
Contraceptives are a valuable and essential part of family planning, but last week Rep. Ciff Bentz voted no on HR 8373, a bill to simply protect a person’s right to obtain and use contraceptives. This is an unacceptable interference with people’s freedoms to choose contraceptives.
Joe Yetter, a physician and veteran running for Representative, will protect our freedoms when it comes to contraception and other health services. It values the individual freedoms of Oregonians in their health care decisions.
Suzanne Marshall
Ashland
