Dear EDITOR:
Americans should be aware of both sides of the climate controversy in order to make informed decisions.
Climate change is a crisis of political science, not real science. Some people believe that climate change will destroy the Earth, but as the late meteorologist and founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman, stated in a 2014 interview. “Climate change is not happening, there is no human-caused global warming now, there has been none in the past, and there is no reason to expect it in the future.”
Socialist-driven governments promote phase-out of fossil fuels to promote cap-and-trade to control carbon emissions with others “controls” benefiting only the rich and privileged political and cultural elites.
I believe that global warming has become a non-scientific social and political issue with a commercial intent funded by national governments and wealthy individuals. It has been documented in great detail how and why there is no crisis. As we move into the future, it looks like the wind, solar, and electric vehicle industries will grow in some capacity, but these industries should be driven by real science and economic viability, not political science with government subsidies.
None of these alternatives can exist without extracting most of the components that are required for each. Therefore, no “clean” in the sense that alarmists who do not understand that everything societies need must be produced from commodities that are grown or mined.
The science is not settled as promoted by world governments and mainstream media. Real scientific evidence shows that we don’t need to get rid of fossil fuels to save the Earth.
Climate change should not be a primary factor when making decisions related to land use, manufacturing or political activity.
CATHY LUKASKO
Brookfield
Today’s news and more delivered to your inbox
